Start free

For corporate CSI, SED & ESG leaders

Every rand is accounted for.
The impact is not.

Companies invest millions into South African communities every year, yet struggle to know which organisations are investment-ready, whether the outcomes can be trusted, and how to prove the impact of every rand. ComplyOS is the evidence layer that answers all three.

See how it works

Evidence formatted for

B-BBEE SEDSection 18AGRI 413IFRS S1 & S2JSE Sustainability Disclosure

Three questions a funder cannot answer

Billions of rand are allocated to CSI, SED and community development each year. The money moves. The evidence does not move with it — and the three questions that decide whether the next allocation is defensible all go unanswered.

01

Who is ready to receive investment?

Governance in place, constitution current, banking verified, safeguarding signed off. Not a self-declaration on a form — a live register the funder can open.
Readiness
02

Can we trust the investment is being used well?

Continuous evidence rather than an annual report. Every claim traces to a dated, hashed artefact uploaded by the organisation and reviewed by someone who is not the organisation.
Trust
03

What measurable impact did the investment create?

Outcomes measured against a stated method, with the denominator disclosed. Where a number cannot be computed, the page says so rather than estimating it.
Impact

Readiness, Trust and Impact are not three marketing words. They are these three questions, in the order they have to be answered.

Investment-ready sports clubs are the trusted bridge between social capital and measurable community impact.

Sports clubs are among the most valuable community institutions in South Africa, and among the most consistently underfunded — not because the money is unavailable, but because a club has no way to demonstrate readiness, governance and impact on the terms a funder is required to report against.

ComplyOS closes that gap from both ends. The club gets the tools for free. The funder gets evidence that can go in front of a B-BBEE verification agency, a social and ethics committee, or an integrated report.

Our mission

To improve the allocation of social capital by making community organisations investment ready, trusted and measurable.

Allocate with confidence. Verify continuously. Report without a scramble.

A live portfolio view of every organisation you fund: who is ready, what changed this month, which evidence is current, and where the next rand creates the most measurable impact.

Evidence, not attestations

Every recognised contribution traces to a dated artefact with a content hash. A claim with no artefact behind it does not render as one.

Formatted for the framework you report against

B-BBEE SED under Code Series 500, Section 18A receipts, GRI 413, IFRS S1 and S2, and the JSE disclosure guidance — all from the same underlying record.

Recognition computed per contribution

Never blended across a portfolio. A contribution that does not meet the SED test is shown as not meeting it, because overstating a scorecard costs a funder a verification finding.

Portfolio

Impact-Readiness by organisation

Coastal Rugby ClubAEvidence current
Northern United FCB2 items due
Valley Cricket ClubCConstitution expired
Highlands NetballBEvidence current

Bands are computed from evidence on file. A band is never assigned by the organisation being scored.

Illustrative interface. Not client data.

The money is already committed.

South African corporates are not short of social spend. They are short of evidence that survives a verification agency, an auditor, or a board asking what the last three years actually achieved.

R13.1bnTotal corporate social investment by South African companies in the reporting yearTrialogue Business in Society Handbook 2025 (28th ed.) — survey of corporate CSI expenditure.
Code 500The B-BBEE scorecard element governing Socio-Economic Development spendB-BBEE Codes of Good Practice, Code Series 500 — 5 points against a 1%-of-NPAT target.
≥75%Black beneficiary threshold a contribution must meet before it is SED-recognisableB-BBEE Codes of Good Practice, Code Series 500. Contributions below the threshold are CSI, not recognisable SED.

CSI is not SED. A voluntary community spend and a scored scorecard element are different things, and a sponsorship carrying a marketing return is advertising spend rather than either. ComplyOS renders which category a contribution sits in and whether it meets the test. It never asserts the claim on your behalf.

Built forRugbyFootballCricketNetballAthleticsHockeySwimmingBasketballTennisBoxing

The delivery side pays nothing

Evidence has to be produced by the organisation doing the work. Charging that organisation for the privilege is how you end up with no evidence. So the rail is free, permanently — and it is free because funders licence the portfolio view on the other side of it.

See what each side gets

Clubs

The funding and compliance rail is free, permanently. Club Ops Suite is an optional R299/mo convenience layer and never gates funding.
Free

Schools

Safeguarding, concussion protocol and parent consent on the same free rail, shaped for a head of sport rather than a compliance officer.
Free

Provinces & federations

Free. A union sees its affiliated clubs' readiness roll up without asking a single one of them for a spreadsheet.
Free

Our promise to the organisation

No funder is introduced to you until you have said yes.

A funder reviewing their portfolio sees that your organisation matches their mandate — its name, province, sport and a count of the outcomes you have evidenced. They do not see the evidence itself.

Turning that match into an introduction takes an explicit yes from both sides. That is a rule in the database, not a preference — there is no setting that turns it off, and it holds whether or not anyone remembers it is there.

Bring us the spend. We will bring the evidence.

Thirty minutes, your own portfolio in view, and an honest answer on what we can and cannot evidence today.